The Intimate Distance Which Is Typically for Family and Intimate Relationships Is Usually:

March 02, 2022 Post a Comment

Report of human utilize of space and the effects that population density has on behavior

Proxemics is the study of human utilize of space and the furnishings that population density has on behaviour, communication, and social interaction.^[1]

Proxemics is one among several subcategories in the study of nonverbal communication, including haptics (touch), kinesics (body motility), vocalics (paralanguage), and chronemics (construction of time).^[two]

Edward T. Hall, the cultural anthropologist who coined the term in 1963, divers proxemics as "the interrelated observations and theories of humans use of space equally a specialized elaboration of civilization".^[3] In his foundational work on proxemics, The Hidden Dimension, Hall emphasized the impact of proxemic beliefs (the utilise of space) on interpersonal communication. According to Hall, the study of proxemics is valuable in evaluating not but the way people interact with others in daily life, but also "the system of space in [their] houses and buildings, and ultimately the layout of [their] towns".^[four] Proxemics remains a subconscious component of interpersonal advice that is uncovered through ascertainment and strongly influenced past culture.

Human distances [edit]

Interpersonal altitude [edit]

Hall described the interpersonal distances of humans (the relative distances between people) in four distinct zones: (1) intimate infinite, (2) personal infinite, (three) social space, and (4) public space.

Horizontal [edit]

A chart depicting Edward T. Hall'southward interpersonal distances of man, showing radius in feet and meters

Intimate altitude for embracing, touching or whispering
- Close phase – less than i inch (1 to two cm)
- Far phase – half dozen to 18 inches (15 to 46 cm)
Personal distance for interactions among good friends or family
- Close phase – one.5 to 2.v feet (46 to 76 cm)
- Far phase – 2.5 to 4 feet (76 to 122 cm)
Social distance for interactions among acquaintances
- Shut phase – 4 to 7 feet (i.2 to two.1 m)
- Far stage – 7 to 12 feet (2.1 to iii.7 chiliad)
Public distance used for public speaking
- Close phase – 12 to 25 feet (3.seven to vii.6 yard)
- Far phase – 25 anxiety (7.half dozen m) or more.

The altitude surrounding a person forms a space. The space inside intimate distance and personal distance is called personal space. The space within social distance and out of personal distance is called social space, and the space within public distance is chosen public space.

Personal space is the region surrounding a person which they regard as psychologically theirs. Most people value their personal infinite and feel discomfort, acrimony, or feet when their personal space is encroached.^[5] Permitting a person to enter personal space and entering somebody else's personal infinite are indicators of perception of those people's relationship. An intimate zone is reserved for close friends, lovers, children and shut family members. Another zone is used for conversations with friends, to chat with assembly, and in group discussions. A farther zone is reserved for strangers, newly formed groups, and new acquaintances. A fourth zone is used for speeches, lectures, and theater; essentially, public distance is that range reserved for larger audiences.^{[half dozen]}

Inbound somebody's personal space is ordinarily an indication of familiarity and sometimes intimacy. However, in modern society, especially in crowded urban communities, it can be difficult to maintain personal infinite, for example when in a crowded train, elevator or street. Many people discover such physical proximity to exist psychologically agonizing and uncomfortable,^[v] though it is accustomed equally a fact of modern life. In an impersonal, crowded state of affairs, heart contact tends to exist avoided. Fifty-fifty in a crowded place, preserving personal space is important, and intimate and sexual contact, such as frotteurism and groping, is unacceptable physical contact.

The amygdala is suspected of processing people's stiff reactions to personal space violations since these are absent-minded in those in which it is damaged and information technology is activated when people are physically close.^[7] Inquiry links the amygdala with emotional reactions to proximity to other people. Outset, it is activated past such proximity, and second, in those with complete bilateral impairment to their amygdala, such as patient South.M., lack a sense of personal infinite boundary.^[seven] As the researchers have noted: "Our findings suggest that the amygdala may mediate the repulsive force that helps to maintain a minimum distance between people. Farther, our findings are consistent with those in monkeys with bilateral amygdala lesions, who stay within closer proximity to other monkeys or people, an effect we propose arises from the absenteeism of stiff emotional responses to personal space violation."^[seven]

A person's personal infinite is carried with them everywhere they go. It is the most inviolate grade of territory.^[viii] Body spacing and posture, according to Hall, are unintentional reactions to sensory fluctuations or shifts, such equally subtle changes in the sound and pitch of a person's vocalisation. Social altitude between people is reliably correlated with physical distance, every bit are intimate and personal altitude, according to the delineations below. Hall did not hateful for these measurements to be strict guidelines that translate precisely to human behavior, but rather a arrangement for gauging the effect of distance on advice and how the effect varies between cultures and other environmental factors.

Vertical [edit]

The distances mentioned above are horizontal distance. There is also vertical distance that communicates something between people. In this case, all the same, vertical distance is often understood to convey the degree of dominance or sub-ordinance in a relationship. Looking upwardly at or downward on another person tin be taken literally in many cases, with the higher person asserting greater status.^[nine]

Teachers, and especially those who work with pocket-size children, should realize that students will collaborate more comfortably with a teacher when they are in same vertical aeroplane. Used in this way, an understanding of vertical distance tin can become a tool for improved instructor-student communication. On the other hand, a disciplinarian might put this data to use in club to gain psychological advantage over an unruly student.^[nine]

Biometrics [edit]

Hall used biometric concepts to categorize, explain, and explore the ways people connect in space. These variations in positioning are impacted past a diversity of nonverbal communicative factors, listed below.

Kinesthetic factors: This category deals with how closely the participants are to touching, from beingness completely outside of body-contact distance to being in physical contact, which parts of the body are in contact, and body office positioning.
Haptic lawmaking: This behavioral category concerns how participants are touching i another, such as caressing, holding, feeling, prolonged holding, spot touching, pressing against, accidental brushing, or non touching at all.
Visual lawmaking: This category denotes the amount of eye contact between participants. Four sub-categories are defined, ranging from centre-to-eye contact to no centre contact at all.
Thermal code: This category denotes the corporeality of trunk heat that each participant perceives from another. Iv sub-categories are defined: conducted heat detected, radiant oestrus detected, heat probably detected, and no detection of heat.
Olfactory code: This category deals in the kind and degree of aroma detected past each participant from the other.
Voice loudness: This category deals in the vocal effort used in speech. 7 sub-categories are defined: silent, very soft, soft, normal, normal+, loud, and very loud.

Neuropsychology [edit]

Whereas Hall's piece of work uses human interactions to demonstrate spatial variation in proxemics, the field of neuropsychology describes personal space in terms of the kinds of "nearness" to an individual body.

Extrapersonal space: The infinite that occurs outside the reach of an private.
Peripersonal space: The space within reach of any limb of an individual. Thus, to exist "inside arm'due south length" is to be within i's peripersonal space.
Pericutaneous space: The space just outside our bodies but which might exist near to touching it. Visual-tactile perceptive fields overlap in processing this space. For instance, an private might run into a feather as non touching their peel but however feel the sensation of being tickled when it hovers just in a higher place their hand. Other examples include the blowing of current of air, gusts of air, and the passage of heat.^[10]

Previc^[11] further subdivides extrapersonal infinite into focal-extrapersonal space, action-extrapersonal space, and ambient-extrapersonal space. Focal-extrapersonal space is located in the lateral temporo-frontal pathways at the centre of our vision, is retinotopically centered and tied to the position of our eyes, and is involved in object search and recognition. Action-extrapersonal-space is located in the medial temporo-frontal pathways, spans the unabridged infinite, and is head-centered and involved in orientation and locomotion in topographical space. Action-extrapersonal space provides the "presence" of our earth. Ambient-extrapersonal infinite initially courses through the peripheral parieto-occipital visual pathways before joining up with vestibular and other body senses to command posture and orientation in earth-stock-still/gravitational space. Numerous studies involving peripersonal and extrapersonal neglect take shown that peripersonal space is located dorsally in the parietal lobe whereas extrapersonal space is housed ventrally in the temporal lobe.

Organization of space in territories [edit]

Two people not affecting each other's personal infinite

Reaction of two people whose regions of personal space are in conflict

While personal space describes the immediate infinite surrounding a person, territory refers to the surface area which a person may "lay claim to" and defend against others.^[ii] In that location are 4 forms of human territory in proxemic theory. They are:

Public territory: a place where one may freely enter. This type of territory is rarely in the constant control of but one person. Nonetheless, people might come to temporarily own areas of public territory.
Interactional territory: a place where people congregate informally
Home territory: a identify where people continuously accept control over their individual territory
Trunk territory: the space immediately surrounding united states of america

These different levels of territory, in add-on to factors involving personal space, suggest ways for the states to communicate and produce expectations of appropriate behavior.^[12]

In add-on to spatial territories, the interpersonal territories between conversants tin be adamant by "socio-petal socio-fugal axis",^[thirteen] or the "bending formed by the centrality of the conversants' shoulders".^[2] Hall has also studied combinations of postures between dyads (two people) including lying prone, sitting, or standing.

Cultural factors [edit]

Personal infinite is highly variable, due to cultural differences and personal preferences. On average, preferences vary significantly between countries. A 2017 study^[14] found that personal space preferences with respect to strangers ranged between more than 120 cm in Romania, Hungary and Saudi Arabia, and less than xc cm in Argentina, Republic of peru, Ukraine and Bulgaria.

The cultural practices of the The states show considerable similarities to those in northern and key European regions, such equally Frg, Scandinavia, and the United Kingdom. Greeting rituals tend to be the same in Europe and in the Usa, consisting of minimal body contact—ofttimes confined to a simple handshake. The main cultural deviation in proxemics is that residents of the United States like to keep more open infinite between themselves and their chat partners (roughly 4 feet (ane.2 yard) compared to 2 to 3 feet (0.6–0.ix m) in Europe).^[15] European cultural history has seen a alter in personal space since Roman times, forth with the boundaries of public and private space. This topic has been explored in A History of Individual Life (2001), under the full general editorship of Philippe Ariès and Georges Duby.^[16] On the other hand, those living in densely populated places likely accept lower expectations of personal infinite. Residents of Bharat or Japan tend to have a smaller personal space than those in the Mongolian steppe, both in regard to home and individual spaces. Different expectations of personal space can lead to difficulties in intercultural advice.^[5]

Hall notes that unlike civilization types maintain different standards of personal space. Realizing and recognizing these cultural differences improves cross-cultural agreement, and helps eliminate discomfort people may feel if the interpersonal distance is as well large ("stand-offish") or also modest (intrusive).

Accommodation [edit]

People make exceptions to and modify their space requirements. A number of relationships may allow for personal space to be modified, including familial ties, romantic partners, friendships and close acquaintances, where in that location is a greater degree of trust and personal knowledge. Personal infinite is afflicted by a person's position in club, with more affluent individuals expecting a larger personal space.^[17] Personal space likewise varies by gender and age. Males typically use more personal space than females, and personal space has a positive relation to historic period (people apply more than every bit they get older). Near people have a fully developed (adult) sense of personal infinite past age twelve.^[18]

Under circumstances where normal space requirements cannot be met, such as in public transit or elevators, personal space requirements are modified accordingly. According to the psychologist Robert Sommer, one method of dealing with violated personal space is dehumanization. He argues that on the subway, crowded people frequently imagine those intruding on their personal infinite every bit inanimate. Beliefs is another method: a person attempting to talk to someone tin can oftentimes cause situations where one person steps forwards to enter what they perceive as a conversational distance, and the person they are talking to can step dorsum to restore their personal space.^[17]

Implementing appropriate proxemic cues has been shown to amend success in monitored behavioral situations like psychotherapy by increasing patient trust for the therapist (see active listening).^[19] Instructional situations take too seen increased success in student functioning by lessening the actual or perceived distance betwixt the student and the educator (perceived distance is manipulated in the example of instructional videoconferencing, using technological tricks such as angling the frame and adjusting the zoom).^[twenty] Studies have shown that proxemic beliefs is as well affected when dealing with stigmatized minorities inside a population. For example, those who do not have experience dealing with disabled persons tend to create more distance during encounters because they are uncomfortable. Others may approximate that the disabled person needs to have an increment of touch, volume, or proximity.^[21]

The thought has been floated that the COVID-19 pandemic has fabricated people agin to hugs or handshakes. Long-term effects, if any, are uncertain. In an article in Psychology Today, author Jane Adams discussed "boundary style," equally the way we behave when we come in contact with people. "Some changes in how we interact with others may be temporary while others could be long-lasting," she says.^[22]

Applied research [edit]

The theory of proxemics is often considered in relation to the bear on of applied science on human relationships. While concrete proximity cannot be accomplished when people are connected most, perceived proximity can exist attempted, and several studies have shown that it is a crucial indicator in the effectiveness of virtual communication technologies.^[23] ^[24] ^[25] ^[26] These studies suggest that diverse individual and situational factors influence how shut we feel to another person, regardless of distance. The mere-exposure effect originally referred to the tendency of a person to positively favor those who they have been physically exposed to most oft.^[27] However, contempo research has extended this effect to virtual communication. This piece of work suggests that the more someone communicates virtually with another person, the more he is able to envision that person's advent and workspace, therefore fostering a sense of personal connection.^[23] Increased communication has also been seen to foster common footing, or the feeling of identification with another, which leads to positive attributions nearly that person. Some studies emphasize the importance of shared physical territory in achieving common ground,^[28] while others find that common ground tin can exist achieved virtually, by communicating often.^[23]

Much research in the fields of communication, psychology, and folklore, especially under the category of organizational behavior, has shown that physical proximity enhances peoples' ability to work together. Face-to-face interaction is oft used every bit a tool to maintain the civilization, dominance, and norms of an system or workplace.^[29] ^[30] An extensive trunk of enquiry has been written about how proximity is affected by the use of new advice technologies. The importance of concrete proximity in co-workers is ofttimes emphasized.

Advert [edit]

Part of Facebook's earning comes from on-site advertising. During these years, Facebook has offered companies the ability to post and present content in a timeline format on their gratis brand or business organisation folio. By doing and so, companies tin can deliver a more comprehensive promotional message and increase audition appointment. If a user "likes" a brand page, corporate content posted on the brand page will appear in the user's news feed. Many users felt angry almost the overly implanted ads that showed upwards in their Facebook timeline.^{[ commendation needed ]}

Users that consider Facebook advertizement "abrasive" and "intrusive" may do so considering companies are invading their social domain (territory) with targeted, paid-for, corporate communications. Those that "hate" receiving targeted messages on their social media profiles could exist experiencing frustration.^[31] It is likely that these users are devoting effort to the creation and maintenance of boundaries around their social function, just to have advertisers break through these boundaries with promotional content.

Cinema [edit]

Proxemics is an essential component of cinematic mise-en-scène, the placement of characters, props and scenery within a frame, creating visual weight and movement.^[32] There are ii aspects to the consideration of proxemics in this context, the first being grapheme proxemics, which addresses such questions as: How much infinite is at that place between the characters?, What is suggested by characters who are close to (or, conversely, far away from) each other?, Exercise distances change as the film progresses? and, Do distances depend on the film's other content? ^[33] The other consideration is camera proxemics, which answers the single question: How far away is the camera from the characters/action? ^[34] Analysis of camera proxemics typically relates Hall'southward system of proxemic patterns to the camera angle used to create a specific shot, with the long shot or farthermost long shot becoming the public proxemic, a full shot (sometimes called a figure shot, complete view, or medium long shot) becoming the social proxemic, the medium shot becoming the personal proxemic, and the close up or extreme close up becoming the intimate proxemic.^[35]

A long shot—the public proxemic
A full shot—the social proxemic
A medium shot—the personal proxemic
A close-up—the intimate proxemic

Film analyst Louis Giannetti has maintained that, in general, the greater the altitude between the camera and the subject (in other words, the public proxemic), the more emotionally neutral the audience remains, whereas the closer the photographic camera is to a character, the greater the audience's emotional attachment to that character.^[36] Or, equally actor/manager Charlie Chaplin put information technology: "Life is a tragedy when seen in close-upward, simply a one-act in long shot."^[37]

Cyberbullying [edit]

Cyberbullying is a advice phenomenon in which a groovy utilizes electronic media in club to harass peers. Adolescents favor texting or computer-mediated communication as an alternative to the more than directly combative face up-to-face interactions because it takes advantage of evading imposed social norms such as "school rules", which are likely to be especially repressive of assailment involving females.^[38] Online bullying has a lot in common with bullying in school: Both behaviors include harassment, humiliation, teasing, and assailment. Cyberbullying presents unique challenges in the sense that the perpetrator can attempt to be anonymous, and attacks tin happen at any fourth dimension of day or nighttime.^[39]

The main factor that encourages cyberbullying is the fact that a cyberbully tin can hide behind the shield of online anonymity. In other words, social media magnifies the face up-to-face social space into a virtual space where a cyberbully can say anything about the victims without the pressure level of facing them.

Virtual environments [edit]

Bailenson, Blascovich, Beall, and Loomis conducted an experiment in 2001, testing Argyle and Dean's (1965) equilibrium theory's speculation of an inverse relationship betwixt mutual gaze, a nonverbal cue signaling intimacy, and interpersonal altitude. Participants were immersed in a 3D virtual room in which a virtual homo representation (that is, an embodied amanuensis) stood.^[twoscore] The focus of this study is on the subtle nonverbal exchanges that occur between a person and an embodied amanuensis. Participants in the report clearly did not treat the agent equally a mere animation. On the reverse, the results suggest that, in virtual environments, people were influenced by the 3D model and respected personal space of the humanoid representation. The result of the experiment also indicated that women are more affected by the gaze behaviors of the amanuensis and adjust their personal space more accordingly than do men. However, men practice subjectively assign gaze behavior to the agent, and their proxemic behavior reflects this perception. Furthermore, both men and women demonstrate less variance in their proxemic beliefs when the amanuensis displays common gaze beliefs than when the agent does not.

Other researchers take established that proxemics tin can exist a valuable tool for measuring the behavioral realism of an agent or an avatar. People tend to perceive nonverbal gestures on an implicit level, and degree of personal space appears to be an accurate fashion to measure people'due south perception of social presence and realism in virtual environments. Nick Yee in his PhD thesis at Stanford discovered that real world proxemic distances also were applied in the virtual world of Second Life.^[41] Other studies demonstrate that implicit behavioral measures such as body posture tin be a reliable measure of the user's sense of presence in virtual environments. Similarly, personal infinite may exist a more reliable measure of social presence than a typical ratings survey in immersive virtual environments.

Meet also [edit]

Behavioral sink – Conceptual plummet in behavior which can result from overcrowding
Torso language – Type of nonverbal communication
Comfort zone
Personal boundaries – Guidelines, rules or limits that a person creates to place reasonable, rubber and permissible ways for other people to behave towards them and how they will respond when someone passes those limits.
Proxemic communication strategies
Shyness – Feeling of apprehension, discomfort or awkwardness in the presence of other people
Spatial empathy

References [edit]

^ "Proxemics". Dictionary.com . Retrieved Nov 14, 2015.
^ ^a ^b ^c Moore, Nina (2010). Nonverbal Communication:Studies and Applications. New York: Oxford Academy Press.
^ Hall, Edward T. (1966). The Hidden Dimension. Anchor Books. ISBN978-0-385-08476-5.
^ Hall, Edward T. (October 1963). "A Arrangement for the Notation of Proxemic Behavior". American Anthropologist. 65 (5): 1003–1026. doi:ten.1525/aa.1963.65.5.02a00020.
^ ^a ^b ^c Hall, Edward T. (1966). The Hidden Dimension. Anchor Books. ISBN978-0-385-08476-5.
^ Engleberg, Isa N. (2006). Working in Groups: Communication Principles and Strategies. My Communication Kit Series. pp. 140–141.
^ ^a ^b ^c Kennedy DP, Gläscher J, Tyszka JM, Adolphs R (2009). "Personal space regulation by the human amygdala". Nat. Neurosci. 12 (x): 1226–1227. doi:10.1038/nn.2381. PMC2753689. PMID 19718035. {{cite periodical}}: CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)
^ Richmond, Virginia (2008). Nonverbal Behavior in Interpersonal Relations. Boston: Pearson/A and B. p. 130. ISBN9780205042302.
^ ^a ^b "Proxemics". www.creducation.org . Retrieved 2016-03-29 .
^ Elias, Fifty.J., M.Southward., Saucier (2006). Neuropsychology: Clinical and Experimental Foundations. Boston; MA: Pearson Education Inc. ISBN978-0-205-34361-4. {{cite book}}: CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)
^ Previc, F.H. (1998). "The neuropsychology of 3D infinite". Psychol. Bull. 124 (2): 123–164. doi:x.1037/0033-2909.124.2.123. PMID 9747184.
^ Lyman, S.One thousand.; Scott, K.B. (1967). "Territoriality: A Neglected Sociological Dimension". Social Problems. 15 (2): 236–249. doi:10.1525/sp.1967.fifteen.2.03a00090.
^ Sommer, Robert (May 1967). "Sociofugal Space". American Journal of Folklore. 72 (6): 654–660. doi:10.1086/224402. S2CID 222428003.
^ Sorokowska, Agnieszka; Sorokowski, Piotr; Hilpert, Peter (22 March 2017). "Preferred Interpersonal Distances: A Global Comparison" (PDF). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 48 (4): 577–592. doi:10.1177/0022022117698039. ISSN 0022-0221. S2CID 53054744.
^ "Edward Hall, the hidden dimension online abstract". Archived from the original on 2006-eleven-24. Retrieved 2006-12-14 .
^ Histoire de la vie privée (2001), editors Philippe Ariès and Georges Duby; le Grand livre du mois. ISBN 978-2020364171. Published in English as A History of Private Life by the Belknap Printing. ISBN 978-0674399747.
^ ^a ^b Alessandra, Tony (2000-02-01). Charisma: Seven Keys to Developing the Magnetism that Leads to Success. New York: Business Plus. pp. 165–192. ISBN9780446675987.
^ Aiello, John R., Aiello, Tyra De Carlo (July 1974). "The Evolution of Personal Space: Proxemic Behavior of Children half-dozen through 16". Human Environmental. ii (iii): 177–189. doi:ten.1007/bf01531420. JSTOR 4602298. S2CID 144162974.
^ Kelly, Francis D. (1972). "Communicational Significance of Therapist Proxemic Cues". Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 39 (2): 345. doi:10.1037/h0033423. PMID 5075888.
^ Ellis, Michael E. (1992-04-30). "Perceived Proxemic Distance and Instructional Videoconferencing: Bear upon on Educatee Functioning and Attitude".
^ Olsen, Carol J. (1989). Proxemic Behavior of the Nonhandicapped Toward the Visually Dumb. University of Nebraska at Omaha. ProQuest 1696286801.
^ "Pandemic Proxemics: Is Six Feet Enough?". Psychology Today . Retrieved 2020-05-xv .
^ ^a ^b ^c O'Leary, Michael Boyer; Wilson, Jeanne M; Metiu, Anca; Jett, Quintus R (2008). "Perceived Proximity in Virtual Work: Explaining the Paradox of Far-but-Shut". Organization Studies. 29 (7): 979–1002. doi:ten.1177/0170840607083105. S2CID 7715386.
^ Monge, Peter R; Kirste, Kenneth Thousand (1980). "Measuring Proximity in Human Organisation". Social Psychology Quarterly. 43 (1): 110–115. doi:10.2307/3033753. JSTOR 3033753.
^ Monge, Peter R; Rothman, Lynda White; Eisenberg, Eric G; Miller, Katherine I; Kirste, Kenneth 1000 (1985). "The Dynamics of Organizational Proximity". Management Science. 31 (ix): 1129–1141. doi:10.1287/mnsc.31.ix.1129.
^ Olson, Gary 1000; Olson, Judith South (2000). "Distance Matters". Man–Computer Interaction. 15 (2–3): 139–178. doi:10.1207/s15327051hci1523_4. S2CID 18990624.
^ Zajonc, R.B. (1968). "Attitudinal Effect of Mere Exposure". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 9 (ii, Pt.two): 2–17. CiteSeerXten.i.one.453.9341. doi:ten.1037/h0025848.
^ Hinds, Pamela; Kiesler, Sara (2002). Distributed Work. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
^ Levitt, B; J.G. March (1988). "Organizational Learning". Annual Review of Sociology. xiv: 319–340. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.14.1.319.
^ Nelson, R. R. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Modify. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
^ Cohen, D. (Feb 23, 2012). "Brands, maintain a Facebook page, just don't bother me".
^ "Cinematography – Proxemics". Film and Media Studies in ESF. South Island School. Retrieved 28 October 2012.
^ "Mise en scene" (PDF). Film Studies. University of North Carolina at Charlotte. Retrieved 28 Oct 2012.
^ "Shot and Camera Proxemics". The Xv Points of Mise-en-scene. College of DuPage. Archived from the original on 28 April 2012. Retrieved 28 October 2012.
^ "Cinematography Part Two: MISE-EN-SCENE: Orchestrating the Frame". California State University San Marcos. Archived from the original on 13 Apr 2013. Retrieved 28 Oct 2012.
^ Giannetti, Louis (1990). Understanding Movies, 5th edition . Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall. pp. 64. ISBN978-0-13-945585-8.
^ Roud, Richard (28 December 1977). "The Baggy-Trousered Philanthropist". The Guardian: three.
^ "The Future Of Adolescent Female Cyber-Bullying: Electronic Media's Effect On Ambitious Female Advice". Jena Ponsford. Texas State University. Retrieved 27 March 2016.
^ Landau, Elizabeth (February 27, 2013). "When bullying goes high-tech". CNN . Retrieved March 28, 2016.
^ Bailenson, J. Due north., Blascovich, J., Beall, A. C., & Loomis, J. M. (2001). "Equilibrium theory revisited: Common gaze and personal space in virtual environments" (PDF). Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments. 10 (6): 583–598. doi:ten.1162/105474601753272844. S2CID 15484007. {{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)
^ Yee, Nick; et al. (2007). "Unbearable Likeness of Existence Digital: The Persistence of Nonverbal Social Norms in Online Virtual Environments". CyberPsychology & Behavior. 10 (1): 115–121. CiteSeerX10.1.1.119.9840. doi:10.1089/cpb.2006.9984. PMID 17305457.

Marlow Saidecalown